From: The roles of ability emotional intelligence in predicting affective decision-making
MSCEIT Component | Description |
---|---|
Emotional experiencing | Individual’s ability to perceive, respond to, and manipulate emotional information. |
Perceiving emotions | Awareness of emotions in oneself and others. |
Faces | Participants evaluate four facial expressions, rating the intensity of an emotion (e.g., happiness, fear) on a 1 to 5 Likert scale. This task measures the ability to identify emotions in facial expressions. |
Pictures | Six pictures, typically landscapes, are presented for participants to rate the extent to which each reflects an emotion (e.g., happiness, sadness) on a 1 to 5 Likert scale, assessing the ability to link emotions with environmental imagery. |
Facilitating thought | Using emotions to assist cognitive processes (e.g., reasoning and problem-solving) |
Facilitation | resented with five scenarios (e.g., decorating for a birthday), participants rate the usefulness of various moods (e.g., annoyance, joy) for each scenario on a 1 to 5 scale. This measures understanding of how moods facilitate thinking. |
Sensation | Participants imagine experiencing an emotion in given scenarios and rate its appropriateness on a 1 to 5 scale, assessing the ability to generate suitable emotional responses. |
Strategic emotions | Individual’s ability to manage and understand emotions in themselves and others. |
Understanding emotions | Knowledge of emotional blends and transitions. |
Changes | With 20 items describing scenarios with evolving emotions, participants identify the most likely emotional transition (e.g., frustration to anger) from a list, measuring understanding of emotional dynamics. |
Blends | Participants connect 12 real-world situations to the most appropriate emotion from a list, assessing the ability to link specific situations with corresponding emotions. |
Managing emotions | Ability to generate appropriate emotional responses and regulating emotions. |
Emotional management | Given five emotionally challenging situations, participants rate the effectiveness of four potential coping strategies on a 1 to 5 scale, measuring the recognition of effective emotional regulation techniques. |
Social management | Participants assess the effectiveness of three behavioural responses in three social scenarios on a 1 to 5 scale, gauging understanding of how actions influence others’ emotions. |