Consequences of academic disappointment inventory: confirmatory factor analysis, reliability and convergent validity

Table 7 Goodness of Fit Information for the Applied Models for the OD Subscale

Model	χ2 (df)	CFI	TLI	RMSEA	90% CI	SRMR	AIC
1 factor	427.217 (104)	0.839	0.814	0.115	0.103—0.126	0.064	13004.745
2-factor 1(positive & negative worded items)	287.025 (103)	0.908	0.893	0.087	0.075—0.099	0.050	12815.624
2-factor 2 (positive & negative worded items mod spec)	202.301 (87)	0.940	0.928	0.075	0.061—0.088	0.044	11800.783
3-factor 1(positive worded items & LM & LBI)	287.078 (101)	0.907	0.890	0.088	0.076—0.100	0.050	12818.565
3-factor 2 (negative worded items & M & BI)	287.403 (101)	0.907	0.890	0.088	0.076—0.100	0.049	12815.688
3-factor 3(BI + LBI &M &LM)	412.456 (102)	0.845	0.818	0.113	0.102 – 0.125	0.091	12966.705
4 factor (M & LM & BI & LBI)	257.471 (98)	0.921	0.903	0.083	0.071—0.095	0.082	12781.271

Note. χ2 = Chi-square value, (df) = Degrees of freedom, p = significance level, CFI Comparative Fit Index, TLI Tucker-Lewis Index, RMSEA Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA), CI Confidence interval, SRMR Standardized Root Mean Square Residual, AIC Akaike Information Criterion, M Motivation items, LM Lack of Motivation items, BI Behavioral Investment items, and LBI Lack of Behavioral Investment items, Mod spec Model specification

ISSN: 2050-7283