Consequences of academic disappointment inventory: confirmatory factor analysis, reliability and convergent validity

Table 5 Goodness of Fit Information for the Applied Models for the PD Subscale

Model	χ2 (df)	CFI	TLI	RMSEA	90% CI	SRMR	AIC
1 factor	698.897 (104)	0.758	0.721	0.143	0.133—0.154	0.084	14418.393
2-factor (positive & negative worded items)	508.963 (103)	0.835	0.808	0.119	0.109—0.129	0.071	14152.740
3-factor 1(positive worded items & LM & LBI)	424.377 (101)	0.868	0.844	0.107	0.097—0.118	0.070	14047.358
3-factor 2 (negative worded items & M & BI)	381.768 (101)	0.886	0.864	0.100	0.089—0.111	0.063	13989.220
3-factor 3(BI + LBI &M &LM)	363.011 (101)	0.893	0.873	0.097	0.086—0.107	0.065	13969.428
4-factor (M & LM & BI & LBI)	204.174 (98)	0.957	0.947	0.062	0.050—0.074	0.046	13773.539

Note. χ2 = Chi-square value, (df) = Degrees of freedom, p = significance level, CFI Comparative Fit Index, TLI Tucker-Lewis Index, RMSEA Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA), CI Confidence interval, SRMR Standardized Root Mean Square Residual, AIC Akaike Information Criterion, M Motivation items, LM Lack of motivation items, BI Behavioral investment items, and LBI Lack of behavioral investment items

ISSN: 2050-7283