Skip to main content

Table 4 Regression-Analysis of appearance evaluation

From: Explicit and implicit affective attitudes of female athletes towards different body sizes

 

Appearance Evaluation

  

Variable

b

SE

β

t

p

95% CI for b

LL UL

Collinearity

Tolerance VIF

Intercept

2.14

0.81

 

2.64

0.009***

[0.54; 3.73]

  

BMI

0.04

0.03

0.13

1.60

0.111

[-0.01; 0.94]

0.67

1.49

AIWD

-0.30

0.06

-0.4

-4.96

< 0.001***

[-0.43; -0.18]

0.64

1.56

Sport competition

0.07

0.11

0.04

0.592

0.555

[-0.15; 0.28]

0.89

1.13

Positive SCS

0.30

0.10

0.26

3.10

0.002**

[0.11; 0.50]

0.58

1.72

Negative SCS

-0.07

0.10

-0.06

-0.65

0.519

[-0.27; 0.13]

0.51

1.94

EAT

-0.21

0.01

-0.25

-3.08

0.003**

[-0.35; -0.08]

0.63

1.59

Group

0.08

0.12

0.05

0.73

0.466

[-0.14; 0.31]

0.81

1.24

Explicit lowest BMI

-0.02

0.05

-0.02

0.28

0.781

[-0.12; 0.09]

0.89

1.12

Implicit lowest BMI

0.00

0.00

-0.08

-1.21

0.229

[-0.001; <0.000]

0.91

1.10

  1. Note. BMI Body Mass Index (kg/m²), AIWD Actual Ideal Weight Discrepancy, SCS Self-Compassion Scale, EAT sum score Eating Attitudes Test. *p <.05, **p <.01, ***p <.001
Back to article page

BMC Psychology

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us