Skip to main content

Table 3 Regression-Analysis of body areas satisfaction

From: Explicit and implicit affective attitudes of female athletes towards different body sizes

 

Body area satisfaction

  

Variable

b

SE

β

t

p

95% CI for b

LL UL

Collinearity

Tolerance VIF

Intercept

3.63

0.73

 

4.94

< 0.001***

[2.18; 5.08]

  

BMI

< 0.0.01

0.02

-0.01

-0.15

0.880

[-0.05; 0.04]

0.66

1.51

AIWD

-0.13

0.06

-0.23

-2.60

0.010*

[-0.29; -0.04]

0.62

1.63

Sport competition

0.03

0.10

0.02

0.30

0.763

[-0.68; 0.23]

0.87

1.16

Positive SCS

0.22

0.09

0.23

2.48

0.014**

[0.04; 0.39]

0.57

1.72

Negative SCS

-0.16

0.09

-0.18

-1.78

0.076

[-0.34; -0.02]

0.51

1.94

EAT

-0.02

0.06

-0.23

-2.61

0.010***

[-0.03; -0.01]

0.62

1.63

Group

-0.03

0.10

-0.01

-0.92

0.927

[-0.22; 0.20]

0.81

1.23

Explicit lowest BMI

0.07

0.05

0.01

0.13

0.896

[-0.09; 0.11]

0.86

1.15

Implicit lowest BMI

0.00

0.00

0.04

0.56

0.580

[0.000; 0.001]

0.91

1.10

  1. Note. BMI Body Mass Index (kg/m²), AIWD Actual-ideal weight discrepancy, SCS Self-Compassion Scale, EAT sum score Eating Attitudes Test. *p <.05, **p <.01, ***p <.001