Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media, as well as to allow video information to be shared for both marketing, analytics and editorial purposes.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
BMC is moving to Springer Nature Link. Visit this journal in its new home.

Table 4 Statistical fitness – confirmatory factor analysis

From: Responsible leadership practices amid COVID-19 to foster nurses’ occupational calling and curtail emotional exhaustion: a pre-and post-intervention effects analysis

Model

X2

Df

X2/Df

RMSEA

TLI

CFI

Pre-Intervention

     

Default fitness

265.776

72

3.691

0.059

0.93

0.93

Two-factor fitness a

558.174

80

6.977

0.110

0.78

0.82

One-factor fitness b

953.022

83

11.482

0.156

0.64

0.66

Post-Intervention

     

Default fitness

259.767

73

3.558

0.061

0.94

0.94

Two-factor fitness a

536.398

80

6.705

0.107

0.80

0.84

One-factor fitness b

927.189

83

11.171

0.151

0.63

0.69

Note: X2 = Chi-square; Df = Degree of freedom; CFI = Comparative fit index; RMSEA = Root means square error of approximation; TLI = Tucker-lewis index. a merges responsible leadership and nurses’ occupational calling; b merges all variables into one factor.