Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | BMC Psychology

Fig. 2

From: Coarse matching was sufficient to capture attention by working memory representations unless matching features with the target

Fig. 2

The FFPs, RTs, and attentional capture effects indexing by RTs (top panel) and FFPs (bottom panel) in each condition for Experiment 1. Each dot represents the attentional capture effect for one participant under a specific condition. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean. “*” represent p < 0.05, “***” represent p < 0.001

Back to article page

BMC Psychology

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us