Development and validation of the sexual distress scale: results from a collectivistic culture

BMC Psychology

Table 3 Confirmatory factor analysis (study 2; n = 393)

Factor	Item	Factor loadings				Residual variances
Factor	Item	Estimate	SE	z	p	Estimate	SE	z	p
1	SF1	0.887	0.026	37.688	< 0.001	0.213	0.025	11.229	< 0.001
	SF2	0.938	0.024	47.428	< 0.001	0.121	0.021	9.172	< 0.001
	SF3	0.848	0.030	32.441	< 0.001	0.280	0.031	12.478	< 0.001
	SF4	0.916	0.026	42.214	< 0.001	0.160	0.023	10.213	< 0.001
	SF5	0.807	0.033	28.263	< 0.001	0.349	0.039	12.852	< 0.001
	SF6	0.828	0.033	30.594	< 0.001	0.315	0.041	12.609	< 0.001
	SF7	0.760	0.039	24.762	< 0.001	0.423	0.056	13.178	< 0.001
	SF8	0.664	0.047	19.000	< 0.001	0.558	0.081	13.482	< 0.001

Notes: Extraction was performed using the Maximum-likelihood extraction technique with no rotation; Variance extracted = 0.685
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) Test: Overall KMO: 0.907; KMO for individual indicators ranged from 0.859 to 0.946; Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity: χ² = 3064.560, df = 28, p < 0.001
Additional Fit Measures: Comparative Fit Index (CFI): 0.913; Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI): 0.878; Bentler-Bonett Non-normed Fit Index (NNFI): 0.878; Bentler-Bonett Normed Fit Index (NFI): 0.907; Parsimony Normed Fit Index (PNFI): 0.648; Bollen’s Relative Fit Index (RFI): 0.870; Bollen’s Incremental Fit Index (IFI): 0.913; Relative Noncentrality Index (RNI): 0.913; Goodness of fit index (GFI): 0.924

ISSN: 2050-7283