Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media, as well as to allow video information to be shared for both marketing, analytics and editorial purposes.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content
BMC is moving to Springer Nature Link. Visit this journal in its new home.

Table 4 Measurement invariance for sex and age variables

From: Responding to old problems in the Dutch work addiction scale: a psychometric approach in a Peruvian sample

Model

x2 (df)

CFI

TLI

RMSEA

SRMR

ΔCFI

ΔTLI

ΔRMSEA

ΔSRMR

Sex

         

Configural

90.933 (28)

0.961

0.942

0.074

0.056

-

-

-

-

Metric

103.186 (35)

0.958

0.950

0.069

0.056

0.003

0.008

0.005

< 0.001

Scalar

95.897 (41)

0.966

0.966

0.057

0.058

0.008

0.016

0.012

0.001

Strict

113.284 (47)

0.959

0.964

0.059

0.059

0.007

0.002

0.002

0.001

Age

         

Configural

86.379 (28)

0.965

0.948

0.072

0.055

-

-

-

-

Metric

101.304 (35)

0.960

0.952

0.068

0.055

0.005

0.005

0.003

< 0.001

Scalar

94.929 (41)

0.968

0.967

0.057

0.057

0.007

0.015

0.011

0.003

Strict

132.196 (47)

0.949

0.995

0.067

0.057

0.019

0.013

0.010

< 0.001

  1. Note. df = degrees of freedom; CFI = comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker Lewis index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; SRMR = standardized root mean residual; ΔCFI = delta of CFI; ΔTLI = delta TLI; ΔRMSEA = delta RMSEA; ΔSRMR = delta SRMR
Back to article page

BMC Psychology

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us