Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of intermediation analysis (n=344)

From: The relationship between psychological capital and athlete burnout: the mediating relationship of coping strategies and the moderating relationship of perceived stress

 

Athlete burnout

Coping strategies

Athlete burnout

 

\(\varvec{\beta }\)

t

\(\varvec{\beta }\)

t

\(\varvec{\beta }\)

t

Constant

4.672**

29.722

−5.962**

−21.711

2.240**

13.095

1. Gender

−0.039

−0.619

−0.046

−0.423

−0.058

−1.31

2. Age

0.016

0.544

−0.003

−0.067

0.014

0.706

3. Sports programs

0.004

0.207

−0.045

−1.276

−0.014

−0.997

4. Athlete level.

−0.015

−0.639

−0.01

−0.229

−0.019

−1.141

5. Years of training

−0.007

−0.191

0.049

0.781

0.013

0.521

psychological capital

−0.539**

−16.023

1.969**

33.515

0.264**

5.377

response strategy

    

−0.408**

−18.623

R

0.668

0.882

0.853

Adjustment R2

0.436

0.774

0.722

F Value

45.231**

196.88**

128.100**

  1. * p<0.05 ** p<0.01
Back to article page

BMC Psychology

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us