Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media, as well as to allow video information to be shared for both marketing, analytics and editorial purposes.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
BMC is moving to Springer Nature Link. Visit this journal in its new home.

Table 4 Comparative fit indices for alternative factor structures of key constructs

From: Unpacking the relationship between adolescents’ perceived school climate and negative emotions: the chain mediating roles of school belonging and social avoidance and distress

Model

Factor

χ 2

df

χ 2

(df)

CFI

TLI

SRMR

RMSEA (90%CI)

Four-factor model

PSC, SCB, SAD, NEE

135.52

38

-

0.983

0.975

0.024

0.041

(0.034–0.049)

Three-factor model

PSC + SCB, SAD, NEE

858.06

41

722.53 (+ 3)

0.858

0.809

0.070

0.115

(0.108–0.122)

Two-factor model

PSC + SCB + SAD, NEE

1016.39

43

880.86 (+ 5)

0.831

0.784

0.075

0.123

(0.116–0.129)

One-factor model

PSC + SCB + SAD + NEE

1156.59

44

1021.06 (+ 6)

0.807

0.758

0.079

0.130

(0.123–0.136)

  1. Note: PSC, Perceived School Climate. NEE, Negative Emotions. SCB, School Belonging. SAD, Social Avoidance and Distress. All χ 2 passed the significance test at 0.01 level