Skip to main content

Table 6 Significant predictors in multiple regression analysis for psychological resilience dimensions and total score (N = 258)

From: Survey of psychological resilience among university students majoring in long-term-care–related disciplines in Taiwan

Variable

B

SE

β

t

p

R2

Adj R2

Family cohesion

     

0.03

0.02

Intercept

37.96

0.49

 

76.88

< 0.001

  

Religious beliefs (Ref: No beliefs)

-0.35

1.32

-0.16

-2.66

0.01

  

Social resources

     

0.05

0.04

Intercept

43.68

0.57

 

76.76

< 0.001

  

Campus-club leadership (Ref: N)

2.38

1.02

0.14

2.34

0.02

  

Academic ranking (Ref: lower)

-3.58

1.49

-0.15

-2.40

0.02

  

Social skills

     

0.07

0.07

Intercept

18.94

0.41

 

46.66

< 0.001

  

Campus-club leadership (Ref: N)

2.74

0.86

0.26

3.18

0.01

  

Future organizational style

     

0.10

0.09

Intercept

17.06

0.61

 

28.11

< 0.001

  

LTC work experience (Ref: N)

1.98

0.68

0.18

2.91

0.01

  

Non-LTC work experience (Ref: N)

1.47

0.62

0.14

2.35

0.02

  

Campus-club activities (Ref: N)

1.44

0.59

0.15

2.45

0.02

  

Academic ranking (Ref: lower)

-2.60

0.95

-0.17

-2.75

0.01

  

Total psychological resilience score

     

0.07

0.05

Intercept

146.54

2.09

 

70.13

< 0.001

  

Campus-club leadership (Ref: N)

8.33

4.31

0.16

1.93

0.05

  

Academic ranking (Ref: lower)

-10.72

4.73

-0.14

-2.27

0.02

  
  1. Note: This table summarizes only the significant predictors (p < 0.05) identified in the multiple regression analysis. The full regression model, including both significant and non-significant predictors, is provided in Appendix 1 for transparency