Skip to main content

Table 6 Hypotheses testing and strength of the model

From: Social media use by teachers during work and its effects on their performance: the role of teacher’s wellbeing and social media addiction

Hypothesis

Proposed relationships

β

SD

t-value

p-value

Decision

Direct effect

H1

SMU → TJoP

0.343

0.050

6.896*

0.000

Supported

H2

SMU → TW-B

0.299

0.046

6.486*

0.000

Supported

H3

SMU → SMAdd

0.170

0.050

3.397*

0.001

Supported

H4

TW-B → TJoP

0.156

0.048

3.236*

0.001

Supported

H5

SMAdd → TJoP

–0.218

0.047

4.622*

0.000

Supported

Indirect effect

H6 (a–b)

SMU → TW-B → TJoP

0.047

0.017

2.784*

0.005

Supported

 

SMU → SMAdd → TJoP

–0.037

0.014

2.620*

0.009

Supported

Total effect

  

0.352

0.046

7.704*

0.000

Supported

  1. Notes:
  2. Critical values. *p-value < 0.001
  3. R2 (TJoP) = 0.210
  4. Q2 (TJoP) = 1–(SSE/SSO) = 1–(1532.863/1816.000) = 0.156
  5. Goodness of fit → SRMR = 0.050; d_ULS = 0.337; d_G = 0.221; Chi-Square = 625.843; NFI = 0.881