Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media, as well as to allow video information to be shared for both marketing, analytics and editorial purposes.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content
BMC is moving to Springer Nature Link. Visit this journal in its new home.

Table 5 Post-hoc comparisons - effects on precision in participant 2

From: Getting nowhere fast: trade-off between speed and precision in training to execute image-guided hand-tool movements

 

D Means

t

P

Session 1

 2D vs. Direct

764.1

11.01

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

435.7

6.28

0.000

 Fisheye vs. Direct

328.3

4.73

0.000

Session 2

 2D vs. Direct

787.2

9.26

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

524.0

7.55

0.000

 Fisheye vs. Direct

263.2

3.09

0.000

Session 3

 2D vs. Direct

432.5

5.09

0.004

 2D vs. Fisheye

199.2

2.88

0.000

 Fisheye vs. Direct

622.8

8.96

0.000

Session 4

 2D vs. Direct

768.7

11.81

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

26.8

0.38

0.698 NS

 Fisheye vs. Direct

741.2

10.71

0.000

Session 5

 2D vs. Direct

741.3

11.02

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

198.1

2.88

0.004

 Fisheye vs. Direct

563.2

8.35

0.010

Session 6

 2D vs. Direct

535.2

6.29

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

31.1

0.45

0.653 NS

 Fisheye vs. Direct

588.0

5.59

0.000

Session 7

 2D vs. Direct

558.3

6.57

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

110.4

1.59

0.111 NS

 Fisheye vs. Direct

442.2

6.39

0.000

Session 8

 2D vs. Direct

890.3

12.10

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

262.3

3.07

0.002

 Fisheye vs. Direct

528.0

8.34

0.007

  1. Results of the post-hoc comparisons for effects on precision of the three levels of ‘viewing’ (V 3 ) in the eight levels of ‘session’ (S 8 ) in level 2 of the ‘participant’ factor. Effect sizes (D Means), t values, and unadjusted probabilities (P) are given for each comparison
Back to article page

BMC Psychology

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us