Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Table 2 Study sample characteristics

From: Adaptation and testing of psychosocial assessment instruments for cross-cultural use: an example from the Thailand Burma border

 

Step 2 N, (%)

Step 4 N, (%)

Total N

158

66

Gender

  

Male

82, (52%)

35, (53%)

Female

76, (48%)

31, (47%)

Ages

  

18-24

29, (18%)

14, (21%)

25-34

58, (37%)

25, (38%)

35-44

43, (27%)

19, (19%)

45-59

24, (15%)

6, (9%)

>60

4, (3%)

0, (0%)a

Marital status

  

Divorced

12, (8%)

9, (14%)

Married

88, (56%)

21, (32%)

single

49, (31%)

26, (39%)

Widowed

9, (5%)

4, (6%)b

Education

  

None

10, (6%)

6, (9%)

Primary school (1-4 standard)

13, (8%)

3, (5%)

Middle school (5-6 standard)

31, (20%)

17, (36%)

High school (9-10 standard)

28, (18%)

14, (21%)

More than high school (post 10)

76, (48%)

26, (40%)

Primary ethnic group

  

sgaw Karen

8, (5%)

11, (17%)

Pwo Karen

8, (5%)

0, (0%)

shan

3, (2%)

1, (2%)

Pa-O

4, (3%)

0, (0%)

Mon

4, (3%)

2, (3%)

Burman

114, (72%)

43, (65%)

Other

17, (11%)

9, (13%)

  1. a2 people missing age.
  2. b6 people missing marital status.
Back to article page

BMC Psychology

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us